|
|
The Dark Side Of Light
As our cities grow (and grow), people must travel
further afield to gaze upon a starry sky. But this
is more than an inconvenience. New research
reveals how light pollution hurts plants, animals
and even human health
By Shannon Wilmot
On a clear night on Ontario’s Manitoulin Island,
you can crane your head back and gaze upon
a sky crowded with stars and other celestial
wonders. You can see the Andromeda galaxy –
the closest to ours at a mere two million light years away
– with the naked eye. “It’s phenomenal,” says resident
Rita Gordon, who has lived on the island since 1990 and
is a founding president of the Manitoulin Island Dark Sky
Association. “The galaxy has billions of stars and is one of the
most faraway objects that can be seen without a telescope.”
At different times of the year, the Orion constellation, the
Summer Triangle, which includes the stars Deneb, Altair
and Vega, and even a couple of nebulas (interstellar clouds
of dust and gas where new stars may form) also light up
the night. The Seven Sisters, or Pleiades, a cluster of stars resembling
a mini-dipper, glow in the night.
Seen from the island on a cloudless night, the Milky Way
slings across a sky that is packed with pricks of light. “We had
an astronomy professor come up from Ohio and he was just
flabbergasted that the Milky Way created such intense light,”
says Gordon. “You just don’t see that anymore.”
In 2001, the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
published the first world atlas demonstrating the pervasiveness
of artificial light in the night sky. The atlas used
satellite data, along with models of how light scatters in
the atmosphere, to show the global impact of artificial lights.
According to the findings in the atlas, approximately one-fifth
of the world’s population, primarily people living in the United
States and Europe, can no longer see the Milky Way without a
telescope or binoculars. Many Ontarians, in fact, cannot simply
turn their head upward and take a look at this spectacular
galaxy. Manitoulin Island is special because it is free of light
pollution. Bylaws passed by several of the island’s townships
and First Nations ensure that outdoor lighting is shielded,
architectural or decorative lighting is turned off at night and
advertising signs are lit from the top rather than the bottom.
The Manitoulin Island Dark Sky Association had lobbied
hard for these bylaws, explains Gordon. She and her
husband operate Gordon’s Park, an eco-resort that includes
a four-hectare area the family designated as a dark-sky
preserve, dedicated to the appreciation of night and to
various astronomy activities that include guest speakers and
summer Astronomy Nights. Every Thursday at 9:00 p.m.
throughout July and August, dozens of visitors learn about
the night sky and observe the heavens using the park’s
Dobsonian telescope and wide-angle binoculars. The
annual Perseid meteor shower in August is especially popular.
According to Gordon, last summer’s Perseids, which
occurred, ideally, during the new moon, delivered as many
as 60 to 80 meteors an hour. “The most vivid description I
can think of is that it looks like the many spots on a peacock’s
feathers moving across the sky,” explains Gordon. “I can’t
wipe that vision from my mind. It’s incredible.”
Manitoulin is not the only place in Ontario to enact
light pollution bylaws, nor is it the only place to have
designated dark-sky areas. In 1995, Richmond Hill, just
north of Toronto, became the first municipality in Canada
to pass a light pollution bylaw. The bylaw regulates the
installation, illumination levels, hours of operation and
replacement of lighting fixtures in both commercial and
residential areas. In 1999, more than 1,900 hectares in the
Muskoka area became the Torrance Barrens Dark Sky Reserve,
the first designated dark-sky area in Canada, recognized
by the Royal Astronomical Society’s Light Pollution
Abatement Program. More recently, the program recognized
the conservation efforts of Point Pelee National Park,
in southwestern Ontario, with a dark-sky designation.
|
|
Yet despite these efforts, few of us can enjoy an unobstructed
view of the sky at night. Light pollution, caused by unshielded,
misdirected and overpowered lights, obscures our
view, bathing many of Ontario’s cities and towns in the glow
of an eerie perpetual twilight.
Simply put, light pollution is light that goes where it doesn’t
belong – illumination from floodlights spilling into neighbouring
yards, unshielded street lights casting light upwards
and horizontally. Gas stations and mall parking lots
are the most egregious light pollution offenders in the city.
“You can practically do brain surgery under some gas-station
canopies,” says Robert Dick, who manages the Light Pollution
Abatement Program and teaches astronomy at Carleton
University. Architectural, or decorative, lights that are set on
the ground and pointed upwards to illuminate the front of a
building or trees in a front yard are another big offender. But
artificial light at night doesn’t just block the view. Researchers
are beginning to discover its adverse environmental effects
on wildlife as well as negative impacts on human health.
As dusk approaches, bird watchers and dog walkers
trail out of the 75-hectare property of the
David Dunlop Observatory in Richmond Hill,
and a different type of naturalist takes their place.
Amateur astronomers set up telescopes on the grass, while
inside the white dome of the observatory, researchers peer
deep into space using Canada’s largest telescope. When it
was installed in 1935, the same year the observatory opened,
the 1.88-metre, 23-tonne telescope was the second largest in
the world.
For more than a decade, dark-sky enthusiasts and members
of the North York Astronomical Association (NYAA)
have also been making visits to Oak Heights, outside of
Cobourg. The eight-hectare woodland site includes such
amenities as a permanent observatory with a Ritchey-
Chrétien telescope and a bunkhouse warmed with a propane
heater. At the annual StarBQ each summer, some 40
association members enjoy the night sky, many of them
camping out. NYAA president Malcolm Park says it’s not
uncommon to be startled by the sound of beavers slapping
their tails or to be serenaded at length by the nocturnal
whippoorwill. But the real excitement takes place in the
sky. At Oak Heights you can see the Milky Way stretch
almost from horizon to horizon and easily lose count of
the number of meteors seen during an intense shower.
For centuries, humankind has been dazzled by a twinkling
sky. The stars have influenced our philosophies,
literature, science and art. Sadly, the window into our
own galaxy as seen from such places as Oak Heights
and Manitoulin Island is closed to most Ontarians. Light
pollution, however, is more than just an annoyance to
astronomers. Clear, dark nights are crucial to our health,
wildlife conservation and energy efficiency.
Studies have shown that excessive light at night can disrupt
our circadian rhythm – the internal clock that evolved
in response to the earth’s day-night cycle. This disruption can
result in chronic illness, sleep disorders and even psychological
problems. Studies done on nightshift workers have
produced startling results. The Journal of the National Cancer
Institute published a study in 2001, which found that women
working the graveyard shift were up to 60 percent more
likely to develop breast cancer. The U.S. study involved hundreds
of women in whom breast cancer had been diagnosed
and examined their exposure to light at night during the 10
years prior to diagnosis. Additional research is uncovering
more findings that support the link between light at night and
breast cancer rates.
|
NIGHT MOVES
For more than a century, naturalists have observed the connection
between light and the phenomenon of bird migration. George
Romanes, friend of Charles Darwin, notes in his 1883 work Mental
Evolution in Animals, “I think it is not very improbable that [birds’]
sense of direction may be greatly assisted by observing the
direction of the sun … and it appears that on very dark and cloudy
nights migratory birds are apt to become confused.” Artificial light
began wreaking havoc on migratory birds with the appearance of
modern lighthouses. Lighthouse keepers noticed high numbers
of nighttime bird casualties around the structures, especially on
nights of low cloud cover or heavy fog.
While we still have much to learn about why birds are disoriented
by artificial light, the proof of its detrimental effect is
everywhere. In 1954, a ceilometer – an instrument used by airports
to gauge cloud cover by pointing a powerful, fixed beam of
light onto a cloud base – on a Georgia air force base was found
responsible for the deaths of approximately 50,000 birds over
the course of just one night. Onlookers witnessed birds circling
in the beam of light and crashing into each other.
The impact of artificial light on the animal world can be varied
and subtle. A 2005 study that appeared in The Condor, published
by the United States–based Cooper Ornithological Society,
concluded that artificial light is altering the singing times of the
American robin. In areas where artificial light had become especially
intense, robins sang between 30 minutes and three hours
earlier than is typical. While these changes may translate into increased
foraging time, it is also thought that an earlier awakening
could make the birds easier prey for nocturnal predators.
Other studies indicate that the reproductive habits of certain
nocturnal frog species that are dependent on extremely low
illumination have been altered. Says Mark Carabetta, Ontario
Nature’s conservation science manager, “The impact of artificial
lighting on amphibians is only now beginning to gain attention.
Because many frogs and salamanders are nocturnal breeders,
they are especially vulnerable to the effects of light pollution.
Several studies have demonstrated that amphibian behaviour is
affected by the presence of artificial light in a way that influences
population dynamics. For example, when exposed to artificial
light, male green frogs call less frequently and spend more time
moving from place to place.”
“Many nocturnal insects have their navigation systems
disrupted by artificial lights, as evidenced by the poor moths
fluttering around any porch light on a summer night,” says Steve
Marshall, professor of entomology at the University of Guelph.
“I am unaware of any studies showing that light pollution has
had a widespread impact on insect populations. Although I have
speculated that artificial light may have contributed to the decline
of some species like the now extirpated giant lacewings.”
Despite the gradual accumulation of research on the impacts
of light pollution, ongoing urban sprawl and the misuse of artificial
lighting ensures that the effect on animal behaviour will continue
to alter the province’s natural landscape.
Jim MacInnis
|
|
Like humans, many animals and plants are dependent on
the earth’s day-night cycle. The proliferation of unwanted
light has been linked to all sorts of unnatural occurrences.
Plants and trees may retain their leaves longer into the season
than they should. Brightly lit roadways, poorly designed
developments, growing urban centres and even misdirected
outdoor lighting on farms can all cause alterations in the
foraging habits of nocturnal animals. Zooplankton normally
feed on algae at night, but a study conducted in 1997 at a lake
outside Boston, Massachusetts, found that urban light pollution
reduced feeding behaviour. Algae can build up, which,
in turn, has a potentially adverse effect on water quality.
Many herbivores, explains Dick, use the cover of darkness as
protection from predators. If a new road or other brightly
lit development is introduced into an animal’s habitat, the
animal may be repelled by the light and move elsewhere.
In a 1996 study on the disruption of the predator-prey relationship
in British Columbia, seals were found to be using
the glare of artificial lights to seek out their prey, juvenile
salmonids. Simply turning out the lights on a nearby bridge
immediately provided the salmonids with better protection
from harbour seals.
Excessive light has been found to affect animal foraging
and hunting habits, as well as communication and reproduction.
In Florida, light pollution is recognized as a major
threat to sea turtles and their hatchlings. Hatchlings emerge
from their nests at night and use the glow of the moon and
stars reflecting off the water to find their way from the beach
to the ocean. Typically, the turtles move towards this light
and away from the dark silhouettes of dunes, vegetation
and other beachfront landscapes. Researchers noticed that
coastal lighting from homes and other developments disoriented
the hatchlings, causing them to lose their way and become
more susceptible to predators, resulting in thousands
of deaths each year. Excessive light also caused female turtles
to avoid nesting sites that were otherwise ideal.
In cities, the perpetual light of office towers and other
skyscrapers kills millions of migrating birds a year. The
Fatal Light Awareness Program (FLAP) is a Toronto conservation
group that works to protect birds by encouraging
Torontonians to turn out their lights at night (see “Flick the
switch,” page 29). Indeed, more birds die each year in North
America from collisions with buildings than succumbed to
the Exxon Valdez oil spill in 1989, when 41 million litres of oil
poured into Prince William Sound, Alaska, killing thousands
of seabirds.
The ultimate dark-sky villain is sky glow. This is
the dome of light caused by architectural lighting,
gas-station canopies, street lights and parking
lot and retail lighting, and other misdirected and
overpowered lights that extend over the province’s urban
areas; the night is never truly dark. As urban sprawl grows,
so, too, do these domes of light, intruding into Ontario’s
wilderness. In a city or town, the severity of sky glow is most
clearly evidenced by how few stars are visible. Misdirected
light scattering off dust and other particles in the air causes
sky glow. Air pollution in cities vastly increases the amount
of particulate matter, thus exacerbating the effect. “As a
result, hardly anyone looks up anymore,” says University of
Toronto professor and astronomer Tom Bolton.
|
FLICK THE SWITCH
“Everyone has encountered a dead bird
at their cottage or outside of their home,”
says Michael Mesure, executive director
of the Fatal Light Awareness Program
(FLAP), “but I don’t think people recognize
the scope of this emergency.” Founded in
April 1993, FLAP is a nonprofit organization
that campaigns to raise awareness about
the hundreds of millions of migratory birds
that die each year after colliding with buildings
or exhausting themselves circling in
the magnetic spell of city lights.
During migration season, birds are
guided in part by the light from constellations
and are naturally attracted to the
lights shining from tall buildings. Birds are
also unable to perceive transparent glass
as a solid object, and collisions with it are
fatal about half the time. Mesure cites the
research of Daniel Klem Jr., a professor of
ornithology and conservation biology with
Muhlenberg College in Pennsylvania, who
concludes that collisions with brightly
lit buildings are a leading cause of death
for migratory birds in North America.
Toronto’s 940,000 structures may cause
nearly 10 million bird deaths every year.
Of the 162 species FLAP has recovered,
at least 64 – including the wood thrush,
yellow-breasted chat, red-headed woodpecker
and peregrine falcon – are classified
as in decline.
FLAP volunteers prowl the streets of
Toronto saving stunned birds from predators
and human traffic. Critically injured
birds are taken to a local wildlife rehabilitation
centre. Dead birds are collected,
documented and eventually handed
over to the Royal Ontario Museum for
research. Since FLAP’s inception, its
volunteers have recovered the carcasses
of more than 40,000 birds.
“The size of the city and the number of
buildings make it impossible for our wonderful
volunteers to recover every bird,”
says Mesure, “so most of our energy goes
towards campaigning for change at the
development level.”
FLAP’s efforts are paying off. In 2006,
Toronto launched the Lights Out Toronto!
campaign to encourage building operators
to shut off their lights when office
space is not being used. In the same year,
Toronto became the first city in the world
to adopt a migratory bird policy, which
was followed shortly by the introduction
of the Bird-Friendly Development Guidelines
as part of Toronto’s Green Development
Standard. These guidelines for
developers include using non-reflective
glass, incorporating visual markers such
as patterned or opaque window designs
and redesigning ventilation grates to include
smaller grate pores so that birds
don’t become trapped. The guidelines
also suggest placing indoor plants, which
may attract birds, away from windows
to minimize bird fatalities. Under these
guidelines and an accompanying ratings
system, buildings can be deemed “bird
friendly,” an incentive that is attractive
to the increasingly environmentally conscious
consumer base and improves the
odds of a building being certified under
the Leadership in Energy and Environmental
Design (LEED) system.
Despite the progress FLAP is making
at the municipal level, Mesure insists
that individuals will eventually determine
whether bird fatalities due to collisions
with buildings will decrease. The burden
is not a heavy one. Asks Mesure, “How
many other environmental crises could be
remedied with the flick of a switch?”
Jim MacInnis
To learn more about FLAP, call 416-366-
FLAP (3527) or visit www.flap.org
|
In 1972, Bolton discovered the first black hole using
The milky way lights up
the sky naturally
photos: Christian Autotte
photo: courtesy of flap
the David Dunlop Observatory’s
telescope. But among dark-sky enthusiasts
he is celebrated more for
having spent two decades fighting
for Richmond Hill’s landmark light
pollution bylaw. Despite the University
of Toronto’s announcement last
September of plans to sell the observatory
and its land – citing light
pollution as part of the reason – Bolton
says that “light pollution has had no
direct negative effect on observing at
the observatory since 1971.” Currently,
the Richmond Hill Naturalists, an
Ontario Nature member group, is spearheading
the Save the David Dunlop
campaign, raising money to save both
the observatory, including the telescope,
and its forest-covered lands. The
group hopes to raise $60,000 to pay legal
fees as it pursues protective measures
for the land. The group is also circulating
petitions and, through events
and weekly guided walks of the site,
highlighting the importance of the
property. “We have a lot of people who
are very concerned about its future,”
says Marianne Yake, president of the
Richmond Hill Naturalists. “It is the
largest green space in the southern
York region left undeveloped.”
Fighting light pollution has united
naturalist and astronomy clubs. In
fact, the Richmond Hill Naturalists
was formed in 1955 by two astronomers;
one was Helen Hogg, well-known
for her efforts in educating the public
on the science and wonders of the
heavens, which included an astronomy
series on TVOntario and a column
that ran in the Toronto Star for 30 years.
Hogg researched globular clusters
– or stars drawn tightly together by
vast amounts of gravity – at the David
Dunlop Observatory. Yake explains
the close relationship between naturalists
and astronomers as a recognition
of the cohesiveness between the
stars above and the earth below. “The
more light we have in our communities,
the more it creates problems for us
seeing nature in its true beauty.”
“For me,” adds Gordon, “it is comparable
to polluted lakes and forests – it’s
another avenue of nature that needs to
be maintained and protected.”
Advocates agree that to convince
more municipalities to take the issue
of light pollution seriously, it is important to emphasize the cost-effectiveness
associated with protection initiatives, due to increased energy efficiencies. Says
Bolton, “We do not need the level of lighting currently being used. It’s just a terrible
waste of energy and money.” The City of Calgary retrofitted some 40,000 of its
street lights with full cut-off lighting – fixtures that by design ensure that no light is
misdirected upwards or horizontally – for an expected annual energy savings of $2
million and as much as 16,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide saved each year. Dick says
that these days, municipalities are more responsive than ever to the light pollution
grievances of its citizens. “Now is the perfect time for us to approach government
and get change started. Street lights last for about 30 years. So what we do now is for
our children and our children’s children.”
Dick’s group worked with Parks Canada to help develop best practices to
protect the nighttime environment in federal parks. The group is now looking
into developing urban star parks. He points out that some parks lock their
entrances at night. A dark-sky preserve requires 24-hour access to a park,
allowing visitors to enjoy the natural environments of both day and night. Dick
envisions kiosks with brochures on star-viewing locations and astronomy, as
well as interpretative, nocturnal walks with a guided tour of the stars. It may
seem redundant to designate as dark-sky preserves protected areas that are
already dark, but Gordon, for one, believes that sanctuaries like Gordon’s Park
are vital to introducing many of Ontario’s children to what the night sky looks
like without artificial light. “I think that as the viewing opportunities diminish
in the places close to urban areas, the appreciation for the dark skies will get
more sincere and the desire to see them will grow.”
|
|
Raising awareness is key. At its annual general meeting last June, Ontario Nature
put forward a resolution recognizing that dark skies are required to protect the
province’s animals, plants and general population from the adverse effects of light
pollution. The resolution set forward measures the organization believes should
be adopted by government, such as retrofitting street lights, changes to the Ontario
Building Code and mandatory energy conservation plans for new buildings.
Even at Oak Heights, Park says the NYAA cannot fully escape light pollution –
three light domes are visible. Not many places are left in southern Ontario where
you can escape the light, he says. But Park does know of one out-of-the-way location
just north of Bon Echo Provincial Park in southeastern Ontario, where the whole
sky is pitch black. That place is affectionately nicknamed Nirvana.
Shannon Wilmot
is a freelance writer based in Toronto.
|
WHAT YOU CAN DO
Although individuals are not huge contributors to sky glow, there are still ways homeowners
can reduce light pollution generated by their property and raise awareness of the issue.
Here are two:
1. Replace floodlights with motion-sensitive lights. Make sure they are set properly – you
want them to come on when someone is walking onto your property, not when someone
is walking past on the sidewalk.
2. Ensure that all exterior lighting is pointed downwards and shielded. You can make simple
shields for the lowest-wattage fluorescent lights using cardboard and white gloss paint,
says Robert Dick, who manages the Royal Astronomical Society’s Light Pollution
Abatement Program. “It is a simple project that kids can do with some modest parental
supervision.” You can find step-by-step instructions on how to build a shield by visiting
the light pollution section of the Starlight Theatre website at www.starlight-theatre.ca.
Use low wattage bulbs whenever possible.
In a nutshell, make sure that light goes where it belongs – not shining up into the sky.
To learn more about light pollution, visit the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada’s
Light Pollution Abatement Program at www.rasc.ca/light
|
Back to Table Of Contents
|

|