|
Reduce logging in Algonquin Park - Provincial report supported by conservation group
A leading conservation group is drawing attention to a quietly released provincial report that
recommends reducing logging in Algonquin Provincial Park. Wildlands League, a chapter of the
Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society, supports reducing logging in the park. Ultimately, the group
wants logging phased out of Canada's first and oldest provincial park.
"Logging in the park flies in the face of protecting wildlife and nature," said Evan Ferrari, Director,
Parks and Protected Areas Program for CPAWS Wildlands League. "This Parks Board report shows that it's
time to bring Algonquin out of the 19th century and into the 21st."
Over 77% of the park is currently open to logging. Logging in Algonquin has vastly altered the composition
of the natural ecosystem. A report by the Ontario Parks Board recently released by government recommends that
more land can be protected within the park while maintaining jobs in the logging industry.
"A park is a park, not a place for industry," continued Ferrari. "While adopting the Parks Board's
recommendations would definitely be a move in the right direction, we must also plan for a long term phase
out of logging in Algonquin. This plan must include a complete analysis of how we help local communities make
the transition to a new economy."
A poll conducted by McAllister Research in March of this year shows that 79% of Ontarians are opposed to
logging in parks. Furthermore, 90 percent agree that Ontario should protect more forests as a shield against
global warming.
“Algonquin is as Canadian as maple sugar, the Group of Seven and family canoe trips," said Ferrari. "It's
iconic and yet we treat it like an industrial zone. Ontarians are ready to end logging in Algonquin Provincial Park."
Ferrari continued: "The 8,000 kilometres of logging roads in the park brings new meaning to the term 'road-kill'.
The Parks Board Report proves unequivocally that it's time to get logging out of Algonquin Provincial Park."
The Commission for Environmental Cooperation’s investigation of Canada’s failure to protect migratory birds
In 1916, Canada and the U.S. signed a treaty to cooperate in protecting migratory birds due to
concerns about over-hunting. Both countries then adopted domestic laws to regulate hunting with
permits and closed seasons. Canada and the U.S. also put an outright ban on interfering with
non-game birds, including disturbing or destroying their nests or eggs. No one considered that
logging itself would break the law.
When the issue of loggers breaking the law was eventually raised, the federal government decided
that unintentional or “incidental” nest destruction that occurred during otherwise legal activities,
like logging, would not be subject to enforcement action. At that time no one figured that habitat loss
from logging could one day cause entire populations of migratory birds to decline.
In 2001, Sierra Legal on behalf of eight well-known environmental groups including Ontario Nature,
complained to NAFTA’s environmental watchdog, the Commission for Environmental Cooperation (CEC), that
Ottawa had no legal justification for its policy of not enforcing the Migratory Birds Regulations (MBR)
against the logging industry. The complaint focused on Ontario and alleged that logging companies there do
not comply with the MBR, and that Ottawa turns a blind eye to the problem.
During the CEC’s investigations they quickly figured out that you can’t enforce the MBR on a case by
case basis when logging is going on. Instead, it’s a matter of making sure that there is always enough
habitat left over for all species of migratory birds to sustain populations at healthy levels.
The CEC report provides in-depth information on how migratory bird habitat is factored into forest
management planning in Ontario. The report shows that after Ontario’s Environmental Assessment Board
approved the Timber Class EA in 1994, MNR was ready to move towards sustainable forest management. After
massive cuts to MNR staff and budget, however, that process basically stopped. MNR had to take a back seat
and hand over control to the logging industry for most planning issues.
The result was that logging companies were left to set their own wildlife habitat objectives, with
little interference from MNR. ‘Bottom-up’ was the name given to this approach. The problem was that
with each forestry company setting its own objectives, no one was tracking overall habitat levels.
In its investigation, the CEC looked 38 forest management plans, covering almost half of Ontario, and
charted habitat projections for migratory birds covered by the MBR. The CEC found that for nine out of
ten species, habitat is predicted to decline over the next century, with the steepest decline reported
for the Pileated Woodpecker, Ontario’s ‘featured species’ for old growth forest. One can therefore expect
that as logging continues, there will be less and less old growth forest.
The surprising part is that Ontario was supposed to have adopted a ‘sustainable’ forest management
system, one that ensures that there is enough old growth forest to sustain populations of wildlife that
depend on such habitat.
The CEC report shows that the federal government is aware, and has complained, that Ontario has
failed to implement sustainable forest management. In 2002, Ottawa pointed out that Ontario was planning
to weaken environmental rules that apply to logging, and that this would affect federal interests,
including migratory birds. In a letter Ottawa sent to the CEC in 2006, however, Environment Canada suggested
that the CEC report on migratory birds addresses matters that are outside of Environment Canada's jurisdiction
and expertise. Ottawa apparently still pretends that logging is not covered by the MBR.
And did we mention that the CEC confirmed the allegation that more that 45,000 bird nests are destroyed
in a single year during logging?
Submitted by Albert Koehl, Sierra Legal
Moraine for Life Adventure Relay
June 16 - 17, 2007
The Relay course is point-to-point from Gore’s Landing on Rice Lake in the east, stretching 160km
westward to King City along the Oak Ridges Moraine. Teams of up to 15 adventurers will tackle the 14
unique relay stages by canoe, bike and on foot. Suitable for all abilities, it’ll be non-stop excitement,
around the clock, in pursuit of the first annual Moraine Cup.
The well-marked route is a chain of trails, country roads, and forest tracks with no extreme terrain. All abilities welcome.
Proceeds from fundraising go to the Oak Ridges Trail Association to help protect the region’s vibrant,
healthy ecosystem, expand the Oak Ridges Trail system and encourage responsible land use of this
wonderful heritage.
www.moraineadventure.ca.
A.D. Latornell Conservation Symposium Conservation Pioneer Award
The Conservation Pioneer Award honours individuals who have contributed significantly to the
conservation movement in Ontario.
These prestigious awards are presented annually to five deserving individuals at the A.D.
Latornell Conservation Symposium.
Who is Eligible?
Any individual who has made a long term contribution and/or achievement, through either their
career or volunteer efforts in the conservation field.
These contributions can include but are not limited to:
Conservation legislation/policy development and reform
Conservation innovation i.e. best management practices in forestry, agriculture, etc.
Habitat enhancement - large restoration/rehabilitation projects
Conservation research
Field work and studies
Education
Planning
Advocacy
Community organization
Who Can Nominate an Individual?
Nominations are typically made by organizations and agencies involved in conservation such
as Conservation Authorities, non profit organizations, government agencies, and universities;
And an organization or agency can make one nomination per year.
How Are the Recipients Chosen?
A committee is appointed each year by the A. D. Latornell Conservation Symposium and
typically includes representatives from the organizing committee, the General Manager
of Conservation Ontario and the Chair of the Land and Water Centre for Stewardship, University of Guelph.
Deadline June 29th
http://www.latornell.ca/pioneer/files/pdf/2007_Pioneer_Award_Brochure.pdf.
Essex County Stewardship’s 2nd Annual Environment Day
June 23, 2007
Come out and find out the Convenient Truth about our local environment, farmlands and food supply.
- Would you like to find out what environmental projects are occurring around the county?
- Would you like to find out more about a locally grown and sustainable food supply and how it benefits the
all of us within the County?
- Come out and see how we can all work to protect our local environments, farmlands and be healthy.
- Come and meet with the local clubs, outdoor and community groups to find out where you can become involved.
Location: Sanson Estate Winery, 9238 Walker Road, just south of McGregor
Time: Saturday June 23, 1:00 to 4:00
Highlights
- Display Tables
- Tours — ECSN Project Sites
- Guest Speakers
- Queen’s University Foxsnake researchers
- St. Anne's High School Aquaculture Lab
- Phil Roberts — CBC Windsor’s Nature Geek & Local Naturalist
For more information contact:
The Essex County Stewardship Network
P.O. Box 1168 870 Richmond Street
Chatham, Ontario
N7M 5L8
Phone: 519-354-4437
Fax: 519-354-0313
E-mail: brett.groves@ontario.ca.
|